The rigorous determination of orthometric heights
Abstract
The main problem of the rigorous definition of the orthometric height is the evaluation of the mean value of the Earth’s gravity acceleration along the plumbline within the topography. To find the exact relation between rigorous orthometric and Molodensky’s normal heights, the mean gravity is decomposed into: the mean normal gravity, the mean values of gravity generated by topographical and atmospheric masses, and the mean gravity disturbance generated by the masses contained within geoid. The mean normal gravity is evaluated according to Somigliana–Pizzetti’s theory of the normal gravity field generated by the ellipsoid of revolution. Using the Bruns formula, the mean values of gravity along the plumbline generated by topographical and atmospheric masses can be computed as the integral mean between the Earth’s surface and geoid. Since the disturbing gravity potential generated by masses inside the geoid is harmonic above the geoid, the mean value of the gravity disturbance generated by the geoid is defined by applying the Poisson integral equation to the integral mean. Numerical results for a test area in the Canadian Rocky Mountains show that the difference between the rigorously defined orthometric height and the Molodensky normal height reaches 0.5 m.
Citation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
Remarks
The final publication is available at Springer via http://doi.org/10.1007/s0019000504452
Collection
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

Dennis, Michael; Featherstone, Will (2003)With the widespread computation of gravimetric geoid and quasigeoid models for GPS height transformation, there is renewed interest in defining vertical datums using height systems that are fully compatible with GPSderived ...

Filmer, Michael Shaun (2010)The Australian Height Datum (AHD) was established in 1971, and is the basis for all physical heights in Australia. However, a complete revision of the AHD has never occurred, despite problems that, although not always ...

Santos, M.; Vanek, P.; Featherstone, Will; Kingdon, R.; Ellmann, A.; Martin, B.A.; Kuhn, Michael; Tenzer, R. (2006)Following our earlier definition of the rigorous orthometric height [J Geod 79(13):82?92 (2005)] we present the derivation and calculation of the differences between this and the Helmert orthometric height, which is ...