Implantable Doppler Probe as a Vascular Monitoring Device in Kidney Transplant Patients: Investigation of Use at a Single Center
Access Status
Date
2022Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Collection
Abstract
Objectives: Vascular complications account for 30% to 35% of total kidney grafts lost during the first 3 months posttransplant. Early detection of vascular complications allows an opportunity for prompt intervention, which is critical to reducing graft loss. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of an implantable Doppler probe as a vascular monitoring device in kidney transplant patients. Materials and Methods: An implantable Doppler probe is used intermittently for postoperative monitoring of kidney transplant patients at our center. In this retrospective study, we analyzed prospectively maintained medical data in which we compared clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who had postoperative implantable Doppler probe monitoring versus standard care clinical observation. Between January 2016 and October 2021, 324 kidney transplant patients were seen at our center. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 194; 60%) included kidney transplant recipients with postoperative implantable Doppler probe monitoring and group 2 (n = 129; 40%) included kidney transplant recipients with standard care clinical observation. We compared number of vascular complications, number of departmental ultrasonographic scans required posttransplant, and graft loss at 3 months between the 2 groups. Results: Vascular complications were identified in 13.5% of total patients, with graft loss identified in 2.1%. Both groups were similar in demographical characteristics. Group 1 had more vascular complications (17.5% vs 9.3%; relative risk = 1.88), fewerultrasonographic scans during the first 24 hours posttransplant (71.1% vs 83.7%; relative risk = 0.84), and lower graft loss (1.5% vs 3.1%; relative risk = 0.48) than group 2. All probes were removed safely after 72 hours, and no complications related to the device were reported. Conclusions: The monitoring device may be used as an additional adjunct for graft monitoring in kidney transplant patients. Further controlled studies are warranted to evaluate this device in clinical practice.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Selvey, Linda; Lim, W.; Boan, P.; Swaminathan, R.; Slimings, C.; Harrison, Amy; Chakera, A. (2017)Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) establishes a lifelong infection that is efficiently controlled by the immune system; this infection can be reactivated in case of immunosuppression such as following solid organ ...
-
Clifford, Rhonda (2004)People with diabetes mellitus are more likely to die from cardiovascular causes than those without diabetes, and modifiable risk factors, such as hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia and hypertension can be targeted in intervention ...
-
Chakera, Aron; Dyar, O.; Hughes, E.; Bennett, S.; Hughes, D.; Roberts, I. (2011)BACKGROUND.: Reactivation of polyomavirus BK (BKV) after renal transplantation can lead to allograft dysfunction or loss with early detection improving outcomes. Current guidelines recommend quantitative polymerase chain ...