Preterm births in South-West England before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an audit of retrospective data
Citation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Collection
Abstract
The COVID-19 lockdown had a series of intended and unintended consequences, including reduced infections and changes in activities and behaviours. Some of these changes may have been beneficial to perinatal outcomes; however, other factors such as reduced access to face-to-face healthcare may have contributed negatively to antenatal care. The aim of this audit was to evaluate neonatal admissions in the South-West of England during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the previous two years 2018–2019. Anonymised birth and neonatal admission rates from January to December 2020 was obtained and compared to data from 2018 to 2019. The results demonstrate a decreasing in neonatal unit admissions between 2018 and 2020, 9.48% of live births in 2018 (95% CI 9.17, 9.80) to 8.89% (95% CI 8.65, 9.13) in 2020 (p = 0.002). Conclusion: There were no significant differences across gestational groups. It is unclear without nationwide data whether our observed trends, decreased neonatal admissions over the past 3 years, are generalisable and related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research exploring the impact of lockdowns on behaviour change during pregnancy and support services is warranted to understand the implications of pandemics on pregnancy and preterm birth.What is Known:• The COVID-19 lockdown had a series of intended and unintended consequences; some of which may have been beneficial to perinatal outcomes.• Research suggests that preterm births have not significantly changed overall, but they have decreased in high-income countries.What is New:• In our audit, analysing retrospective data of regional birth and neonatal admission from the South-West of England, we observed a decrease in live birth rates between 2018 and 2020.• A reduction in neonatal unit admissions was observed from 2018 to 2020 with no significant differences across gestational groups. The reduction from 2019 to 2020 was smaller than that from 2018 to 2019 implying that the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 was not necessarily implicated.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Andrei, Daniela ; Chong, Jane; Parker, Sharon K; Zoszak, Leah; Petery, Gretchen; Baird, Marian (2022)Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been much attention given to the way inherent aspects of work and jobs are being altered, potentially in irreversible ways. The implications for the mature workforce are ...
-
Whiting, D.; Atee, Mustafa ; Morris, T.; Cunningham, C. (2021)BACKGROUND: Globally, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a significant disruption to the physical and mental well-being of all individuals, including those living with dementia. Social restrictions and lockdown ...
-
Kizekova, Alica; Kizekova, Alica [0000-0002-0311-5888]; Kizekova, Alica [0000-0002-0311-5888]; Kizekova, Alica [56014042900]; Kizekova, Alica [56014042900] (2021)Looking back at various predictions for the year 2020, one could sense some optimism from analyses related to the Czech political scene and/or economy, or globally, the outcomes of the US presidential elections and Brexit, ...