The Persistent Problem of Consent in Australian Criminal Laws on Trafficking in Persons, Slavery and Slavery-like Practices
Access Status
Date
2024Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Collection
Abstract
The Australian federal government, in its recent review of the trafficking in persons, slavery and slavery like offences in divs 270 and 271 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), revisited the question of whether these offences adequately enshrine the principle of the irrelevance of consent originating in art 3(b) of the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children. The task of ensuring compliance with this principle is fraught, given that both the meaning of consent in this context and the parameters of the principle itself are not settled. This article argues that, contrary to the intention of Australian legislators, consent is in fact relevant for the purposes of establishing a number of the offences in divs 270 and 271. It suggests that law reform on this matter is warranted, not only to address compliance with international law, but also to contend with challenges in the implementation of these laws connected to the meaning and role of consent.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Wai, C.; Mackey, S.; Hegney, Desley (2012)Aim: This review aimed to critically appraise, synthesise and present the best available evidence related to the experiences of patients who have donated their residual biological samples and the impact of this experience ...
-
Ho, P.; Downs, Jennepher; Bulsara, C.; Patman, S.; Hill, Anne-Marie (2018)Accessible Summary: People with intellectual disability do not often take part in research. When people with intellectual disability are thinking about taking part in research, it is important that they are given support ...
-
Woodley, Giselle ; Hendriks, Jacqui (2024)The Australian government’s new campaign Consent Can’t Wait challenges us all to improve our understanding of consent. It asks a series of questions to illustrate this issue is more complex than simplistic “no means no” ...