Comprehensive analysis on GPS carrier phase under various cutoff elevation angles and its impact on station coordinates repeatability

Abstract

When processing the carrier phase, the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) grants the highest precision for geodetic measurements. The analysis centers (ACs) from the International GNSS Service (IGS) provide different data such as precise clock data, precise orbits, reference frame, ionosphere and troposphere data, as well as other geodetic products. Each individual AC has its own strategy for delivering the abovementioned products, with one of the key elements being the cutoff elevation angle. Typically, this angle is arbitrarily chosen using generic values without studying the impact of this choice on the obtained results, in particular when very precise positions are considered. This article addresses this issue. To this end, the article has two key sections, and the first is to evaluate the impact of using the two different cutoff elevation angles that are most widely used: (a) 3 degrees cutoff and (b) 10 degrees cutoff elevation angle. This analysis is completed in two major parts: (i) the analysis of the root mean square (RMS) for the carrier phase and (ii) the analysis of the station position in terms of repeatability. The second key section of the paper is a comprehensive carrier phase analysis conducted by adopting a new approach using a mean of the 25-point average RMS (A-RMS) and the single-point RMS and using an ionosphere-free linear combination. By using the ratio between the 25-point average RMS and the single-point RMS we can define the type of scatter that dominates the phase solution. The analyzed data span a one-year period. The tested GNSS stations belong to the EUREF Permanent Network (EPN) and the International GNSS Service (IGS). These comprise 55 GNSS stations, of which only 23 GNSS stations had more than 95% data availability for the entire year. The RMS and A-RMS are analyzed in conjunction with the precipitable water vapor (PWV), which shows clear signs of temporal correlation. Of the 23 GNSS stations, three stations show an increase of around 50% of the phase RMS when using a 3° cutoff elevation angle, and only four stations have a difference of 5% between the phase RMS when using both cutoff elevation angles. When using the A-RMS, there is an average improvement of 37% of the phase scatter for the 10° cutoff elevation angle, whereas for the 3° cutoff elevation angle, the improvement is around 33%. Based on studying this ratio, four stations indicate that the scatter is dominated by the stronger-than-usual dominance of long-period variations, whereas the others show short-term noise. In terms of station position repeatability, the weighted root mean square (WRMS) is used as an indicator, and the results between the differences of using a 3° and 10° cutoff elevation angle strategy show a difference of −0.16 mm for the North component, −0.21 mm for the East component and a value of −0.75 mm for the Up component, indicating the importance of using optimal cutoff angles.