Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaile, Tsegaye G
dc.contributor.authorTessema, Gizachew A
dc.contributor.authorHertzog, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorNewnham, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorDachew, Berihun
dc.contributor.authorMakate, Marshall
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T06:10:09Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T06:10:09Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationHaile, T.G. and Tessema, G.A. and Hertzog, L. and Newnham, E. and Dachew, B. and Makate, M. 2024. Cost-effectiveness and benefits of perinatal health interventions in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations. PLoS One.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/95421
dc.description.abstract

Background: Despite ongoing efforts, perinatal morbidity and mortality persist across all settings, imposing a dual burden of clinical and economic strain. Besides, the fragmented nature of economic evidence on perinatal health interventions hinders the formulation of effective health policies. Our review aims to comprehensively and critically assess the economic evidence for such interventions in high-income countries, where the balance of health outcomes and fiscal prudence is paramount. Methods and analysis: We will conduct a comprehensive search for studies using databases including EconLit (EBSCO), Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid), and PubMed. Furthermore, we will broaden our search to include Google Scholar and conduct snowballing from the final articles included. The search terms will encompass economic evaluation, perinatal health interventions, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and high-income countries. We will include full economic evaluations, focusing on cost- effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, and cost-minimisation analyses. We will exclude partial economic evaluations, reports, qualitative studies, conference papers, editorials, and systematic reviews. Date restrictions will limit the review to studies published after 2010 and those in English during the study selection process. We will use the modified Drummond checklist to evaluate the quality of each included study. Our findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. A summary will be provided, including estimated costs, effectiveness, benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We also plan to conduct a subgroup analysis. To aid comparability, we will standardise all costs to the United States Dollar, adjusting them to their 2022 value using country specific consumer price index and purchasing power parity.

dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.titleCost-effectiveness and benefits of perinatal health interventions in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn1932-6203
dcterms.source.titlePLoS One
dc.date.updated2024-07-03T06:10:07Z
curtin.departmentCurtin School of Population Health
curtin.accessStatusIn process
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidMakate, Marshall [0000-0002-2005-2970]
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridMakate, Marshall [57191225058]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record