Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHai-ni, Pao
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorTsang-sung, Yang
dc.contributor.authorJyan-syung, Tsai
dc.contributor.authorYi-ting, Hwang
dc.contributor.authorWatson H.T., Sung
dc.contributor.authorDirk, Pfeiffer
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T07:03:11Z
dc.date.available2024-07-19T07:03:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationHai-ni, P. and Jackson, E. and Tsang-sung, Y. and Jyan-syung, T. and Yi-ting, H. and Watson H.T., S. and Dirk, P. 2024. Clustering broiler farmers based on their behavioural differences towards biosecurity to prevent highly pathogenic avian influenza. OneHealth. 19: 100852.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/95526
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100852
dc.description.abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an important zoonotic disease. The study aims to identify farmer behaviour types to inform the design of behaviour change programmes for mitigating the transmission of HPAI. Therefore, the study utilised multivariate statistical analysis for gaining a better understanding of the relationships among farmers' 30 biosecurity behaviours, the risk of HPAI infection, and distinct features of commercial broiler farmers, which is different from using simple and few binary biosecurity measures. Convenience sampling was used to collect data from 303 Taiwan's farmers among which 40 farmers (13.2%) self-reported having had a HPAI outbreak in the study year while 16 farmers (5.3%) self-reported having had a HPAI outbreak in the past two years. Using categorical principal components analysis and a two-stage cluster analysis, four farmer clusters were identified with distinct features: 1)‘Reserved’ (4.6%) tended to choose ‘No idea’ for answering specific questions about HPAI; 2)‘Secure’ (76.3%) had a higher biosecurity status than the other farms; 3) ‘Jeopardised’ (16.8%) had a lower biosecurity status than the other farms; 4) ‘No-response’ (2.3%) tended to skip specific questions about HPAI. The biosecurity status of the ‘Reserved’ and ‘No-response’ clusters was undetermined, placing these farms at risk of HPAI infection. Compared to the ‘Secure’ cluster, the ‘Jeopardised’ cluster exhibited higher odds of self-reported HPAI in the study year (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.22–5.58) and in the past two years (OR: 4.28, 95% CI: 1.39–13.19). Additionally, the ‘Jeopardised’ cluster showed increased odds of HPAI recurrence (OR: 4.01, 95% CI: 1.41–11.43). Our study demonstrates that inadequate biosecurity practices can elevate the occurrence or recurrence of HPAI outbreaks. The findings underscore the importance of distinguishing between these clusters to accurately assess the risk of HPAI infection across farms. Furthermore, understanding farmers' behaviours can inform the development of strategies aimed at behaviour change among farmers.

dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleClustering broiler farmers based on their behavioural differences towards biosecurity to prevent highly pathogenic avian influenza
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume19
dcterms.source.issn2352-7714
dcterms.source.titleOneHealth
dc.date.updated2024-07-19T07:03:10Z
curtin.departmentSchool of Management and Marketing
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Business and Law
curtin.contributor.orcidJackson, Elizabeth [0000-0002-5084-7010]
curtin.identifier.article-number100852
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridJackson, Elizabeth [55775960200]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/