Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAncliffe, L.
dc.contributor.authorCastle, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, T.J.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, H. M. L.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-12T07:26:44Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T07:26:44Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationAncliffe, L. and Castle, E.M. and Wilkinson, T.J. and Young, H.M.L. 2024. A national survey of current rehabilitation service provisions for people living with chronic kidney disease in the UK: Implications for policy and practice. BMC Nephrology. 25: 302.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/95882
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12882-024-03742-4
dc.description.abstract

Background: National guidance recognises the key role of rehabilitation in improving outcomes for people living with chronic kidney disease. Implementation of this guidance is reliant upon an adequate and skilled rehabilitation workforce. Data relating to this is currently lacking within the UK. This survey aimed to identify variations and good practices in kidney physiotherapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT) and clinical exercise physiologist (CEP) provision; and to understand barriers to implementation. Methods: An online survey was sent to all 87 UK kidney units between June 2022 and January 2023. Data was collected on the provision of therapy services, barriers to service provision and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The quantitative survey was analysed using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were explored using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Forty-five units (52%) responded. Seventeen (38%) units reported having a PT and 15 (33%) an OT with a specialist kidney role; one unit (7%) had access to a CEP. Thirty units (67%) offered inpatient therapy services, ten (22%) outpatient therapy clinics, six (13%) intradialytic exercise, six (13%) symptom management and three (7%) outpatient rehabilitation. Qualitative data revealed lack of money/funding and time (both n = 35, 85% and n = 34, 83% respectively) were the main barriers to delivering kidney-specific therapy. Responders saw an increase in the complexity of their caseload, a reduction in staffing levels and consequently, service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemplars of innovative service delivery, including hybrid digital and remote services, were viewed as positive responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Despite clear evidence of the benefits of rehabilitation, across the UK, there remains limited and variable access to kidney-specific therapy services. Equitable access to kidney-specific rehabilitation services is urgently required to support people to ‘live well’ with kidney disease.

dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleA national survey of current rehabilitation service provisions for people living with chronic kidney disease in the UK: Implications for policy and practice
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn1471-2369
dcterms.source.titleBMC Nephrology
dc.date.updated2024-09-12T07:26:43Z
curtin.departmentCurtin School of Allied Health
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
curtin.contributor.orcidCastle, Ellen [0000-0002-6961-6108]
curtin.contributor.orcidCastle, Ellen [0000-0002-6961-6108]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/