Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoens, Gabriël
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:14:07Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:14:07Z
dc.date.created2014-10-14T00:55:07Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationMoens, G. 2009. Can a Good Mediator also be a Good Arbitrator? Asia Pacific Law Review. 17: pp. 31-40.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9642
dc.description.abstract

This Article considers whether a good mediator can also be a good arbitrator. It provides examples of domestic legislation which allow mediators to serve as arbitrators, even in the same dispute. The requirements of natural justice, which are integral to the arbitration process, are largely ineffective in mediation proceedings. It is argued that, because of the ineffectiveness of the application of the rules of natural justice in mediation proceedings, the roles of mediators and arbitrators are distinct and incompatible.

dc.publisherLexisNexis Hong Kong
dc.titleCan a Good Mediator also be a Good Arbitrator?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume17
dcterms.source.startPage31
dcterms.source.endPage40
dcterms.source.issn1019-2557
dcterms.source.titleAsia Pacific Law Review
curtin.departmentSchool of Business Law
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record