Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMammadli, Anvar
dc.contributor.authorBarakos, George
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ping
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-22T05:54:51Z
dc.date.available2025-02-22T05:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationMammadli, A. and Barakos, G. and Chang, P. 2024. Assessment of Critical and Strategic Raw Materials for Australia using an AHP-Based Smart Computational Tool. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Sustainable Development in the Minerals Industry (SDIMI2024), 9-11 July 2024, Torino, Italy.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/97183
dc.description.abstract

Due to various factors in different periods of the past two centuries, namely advancing technology, population growth, and even nowadays, the net zero emission goals, the supply and demand of minerals and metals have raised concerns. These concerns pushed many governments to take steps to assess the criticality of such commodities. Determining critical and strategic raw materials and their impact factors is essential to ensuring an efficient and sustainable supply within the mining industry globally. Criticality is generally defined as a combination of a commodity's economic importance and the risk of supply disruption (Buijs et al., 2012; Schrijvers et al., 2020). It is an undeniable fact that raw materials are the backbone of many commercial and industrial sectors globally. No matter the era, their economic importance was one of the primary reasons that had an outstanding impact on their criticality status. Nevertheless, it is impossible to assess and decide according to only one impact factor; criticality is not a singular aspect but rather a complex interplay of economic, environmental, geopolitical, social, and cultural factors (Castro-Sejin et al., 2023). The term 'criticality' has evolved over time. During World Wars I and II, strategic raw materials were deemed critical due to their unavailability during war or national emergencies (U.S. Congress, 1939; Roush, 1939). In the 1950s, as the modern economy grew more complex, challenges related to materials, defence, emergencies, limited supply, and urbanization reshaped the concept of criticality. Since then, 'critical' has been used for emergency situations, while 'strategic raw materials' are reserved for strategic purposes and available cases. This historical context is crucial for understanding the current discourse on criticality (Orchard, 1951). This research holds significant implications for Australia's strategic planning. By identifying and evaluating critical and strategic minerals in a more comprehensive manner, Australia can formulate a more detailed plan to exploit these commodities more efficiently, thereby positioning itself as a key player in global commodities markets.

dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSDIMI
dc.titleAssessment of Critical and Strategic Raw Materials for Australia using an AHP-Based Smart Computational Tool
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.startPage135
dcterms.source.endPage141
dcterms.source.isbn978-0-646-71185-0
dcterms.source.conference11th International Conference on Sustainable Development in the Minerals Industry (SDIMI2024)
dcterms.source.conference-start-date9 Jul 2024
dcterms.source.conferencelocationTorino, Italy
dc.date.updated2025-02-22T05:54:50Z
curtin.departmentWASM: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.contributor.orcidBarakos, George [0000-0001-9741-7942]
dcterms.source.conference-end-date11 Jul 2024
curtin.contributor.scopusauthoridBarakos, George [57216239505]
curtin.repositoryagreementV3


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record