Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnnear, M.
dc.contributor.authorToye, Christine
dc.contributor.authorEccleston, C.
dc.contributor.authorMcInerney, F.
dc.contributor.authorElliott, K.
dc.contributor.authorTranter, B.
dc.contributor.authorHartley, T.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:15:10Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:15:10Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T04:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationAnnear, M. and Toye, C. and Eccleston, C. and McInerney, F. and Elliott, K. and Tranter, B. and Hartley, T. et al. 2015. Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 63 (11): pp. 2375-2381.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/9837
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgs.13707
dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable and valid dementia knowledge scale to address limitations of existing measures, support knowledge evaluation in diverse populations, and inform educational intervention development. DESIGN: A five-stage, systematic scale development process was employed to construct and assess the psychometric properties of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (DKAS). SETTING: Data for the study were generated in an online environment and during clinical dementia care placements from Australian (n = 1,321) and international respondents (n = 446). PARTICIPANTS: Volunteers from a dementia-related massive open online course (n = 1,651), medical students on clinical placement in a residential aged care facility (n = 40), and members of the Australian health workforce (n = 76). MEASUREMENTS: Psychometric properties of the DKAS were established using a literature review to assess the veracity of scale items, respondent feedback during pilot testing, a Delphi study with dementia experts, construction and review by an expert panel, evaluation of item difficulty, item-total and interitem correlations. Principal components analysis (PCA) was also performed along with measures of test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and concurrent validity. RESULTS: The pilot DKAS was reduced from 40 to 27 items during analysis. PCA identified four distinct and interpretable factors. The revised DKAS displays high levels of test-retest reliability; internal consistency; and preliminary construct, concurrent, and factorial validity. CONCLUSION: The 27-item DKAS is reliable and shows preliminary validity for the assessment of knowledge deficiencies and change in those who provide care and treatment for people with dementia.

dc.titleDementia Knowledge Assessment Scale: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume63
dcterms.source.number11
dcterms.source.startPage2375
dcterms.source.endPage2381
dcterms.source.titleJ Am Geriatr Soc
curtin.departmentSchool of Nursing and Midwifery
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record