The Australian asset-pricing debate
Citation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
© 2015 AFAANZ. Utilising a comprehensive data set for Australian firms, we examine a range of competing asset-pricing models, including the four- and five-factor models where the equity-risk premium is augmented by size, value, momentum and liquidity premia, and find that none of the models tested appears to adequately explain the cross section of Australian returns. A model accounting for Australia's integration with the US equity market appears to be the best of the competing models we study. Our argument that a model recognising Australia's integration with the USA is supported when we apply the portfolio and factor construction methodology suggested by Brailsford et al. (2012a,b).
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Alkroosh, Iyad Salim Jabor (2011)This thesis presents the development of numerical models which are intended to be used to predict the bearing capacity and the load-settlement behaviour of pile foundations embedded in sand and mixed soils. Two artificial ...
-
Amiri, Amirpiran (2013)The alumina industry provides the feedstock for aluminium metal production and contributes to around A$6 billion of Australian exports annually. One of the most energy-intensive parts of alumina production, with a strong ...
-
Fulton, B.; Jones, Tod; Boschetti, F.; Sporcic, M.; De La Mare, W.; Syme, Geoffrey; Dzidic, Peta; Gorton, R.; Little, L.; Dambacher, G.; Chapman, K. (2011)We describe the different types of models we used as part of an effort to inform policy-making aiming at the management of the Ningaloo coast in the Gascoyne region, Western Australia. This provides an overview of how ...