Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCaul, K.
dc.contributor.authorLawrence-Brown, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDickinson, J.
dc.contributor.authorNorman, P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:25:17Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:25:17Z
dc.date.created2017-01-23T19:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMcCaul, K. and Lawrence-Brown, M. and Dickinson, J. and Norman, P. 2016. Long-term outcomes of the western australian trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. 176 (12): pp. 1761-1767.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11538
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6633
dc.description.abstract

Importance: Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains high. The benefit of screening older men for AAAs needs to be assessed in a range of health care settings. Objective: To assess the influence of screening for AAAs in men aged 64 to 83 years on mortality from AAAs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial performed from April 1, 1996, through March 31, 1999, with a mean of 12.8 years of follow-up (range, 11.6-14.2 years) included a population-based sample from a single metropolitan region in Western Australia identified via the electoral roll. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2015, to June 1, 2016. Interventions: Randomization to an invitation to undergo ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta or a control group without invitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Surgery for and mortality from AAA. Results: A total of 49 801 men aged 64 to 83 years were identified for the study. Men living too far from screening centers (n = 8671) or who died before invitation (n = 2650) were excluded, resulting in 19 249 men in the invited group and 19 231 controls (mean [SD] age, 72.5 [4.6] years; 95% white). Of 19 249 men invited for screening, 12 203 (63.4%) attended. There were more elective operations (536 vs 414, P < .001) and fewer ruptured AAAs (72 vs 99, P = .04) in the invited group compared with the control group. Overall, there were 90 deaths from AAAs in the invited group (mortality rate, 47.86 per 100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 38.93-58.84) and 98 in the control group (52.53 per 100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 43.09-64.03) for a rate ratio of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.68-1.21). For men aged 65 to 74 years, the AAA mortality rate in the invited group was 34.52 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 26.02-45.81) compared with 37.67 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 28.71-49.44) in the control group for a rate ratio of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.62-1.36). The number needed to invite for screening to prevent 1 death from an AAA in 5 years was 4784 for men aged 64 to 83 years and 3290 for men aged 65 to 74 years. There were no meaningful differences in all-cause, cardiovascular, and other mortality risks. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of the electoral roll to identify and invite men aged 64 to 83 years for screening for AAAs had no significant effect on the overall mortality from AAAs.

dc.titleLong-term outcomes of the western australian trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume176
dcterms.source.startPage1761
dcterms.source.endPage1767
dcterms.source.issn2168-6106
dcterms.source.titleJAMA Internal Medicine
curtin.departmentCentre for Population Health Research
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record