Winners and losers in Vietnam equitisation programs
Access Status
Authors
Date
2014Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Remarks
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Policy Modeling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 36, No. 1 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.012
Collection
Abstract
This article develops a computable general equilibrium model of Vietnam to assess the long-run likely effects of the country’s equitisation programs on its national economic outcomes and industries. Equitisation is found to be pro-growth as reflected in its contribution to increasing real GDP growth rate in the long run. In terms of industrial output growth rates, the winners include electrical, steel and other manufacturing, while the losers include rice and paddy, and oil, gas and petroleum. To achieve better economic outcomes, the coverage of equitisation should be extended to include medium to large state-owned enterprises across all industries.