Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLe, Hoang
dc.contributor.authorCabalu, Helen
dc.contributor.authorSalim, Ruhul
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:25:31Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:25:31Z
dc.date.created2014-03-04T20:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationLe, Hoang Cuong and Cabalu, Helen and Salim, Ruhul. 2014. Winners and losers in Vietnam equitisation programs. Journal of Policy Modeling. 36 (1): pp. 172-184.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11554
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.012
dc.description.abstract

This article develops a computable general equilibrium model of Vietnam to assess the long-run likely effects of the country’s equitisation programs on its national economic outcomes and industries. Equitisation is found to be pro-growth as reflected in its contribution to increasing real GDP growth rate in the long run. In terms of industrial output growth rates, the winners include electrical, steel and other manufacturing, while the losers include rice and paddy, and oil, gas and petroleum. To achieve better economic outcomes, the coverage of equitisation should be extended to include medium to large state-owned enterprises across all industries.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.subjectEquitisation
dc.subjectState-owned enterprises
dc.subjectDoi Moi
dc.subjectComputable general equilibrium
dc.subjectPrivatisation
dc.titleWinners and losers in Vietnam equitisation programs
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume36
dcterms.source.startPage172
dcterms.source.endPage184
dcterms.source.issn0161-8938
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Policy Modeling
curtin.note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Policy Modeling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 36, No. 1 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.012

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record