Associations of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time with health-related quality of life among colon cancer survivors
Access Status
Authors
Date
2014Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
School
Collection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study was to determine associations of accelerometer-assessed moderate- to vigorousintensity physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function and well-being in colon cancer survivors. METHODS: Colon cancer survivors (N=178) from Alberta, Canada (n=92) and Western Australia (n=86) completed a mailed survey that assessed HRQoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal), physical function and wellbeing (Trial Outcome Index-Colorectal), and relevant covariates. MVPA and sedentary time were assessed using the Actigraph GT3X1 accelerometer (60-second epochs) via a 7-day monitoring protocol. Average daily MVPA and sedentary time was corrected for wear time and then examined as quartiles. RESULTS: Adjusting for relevant demographic, behavioral, and clinical covariates, a significant difference in HRQoL scores emerged between quartile 1 (Q1) and Q4 (Mdiff=11.5, P=.038). For physical function and wellbeing, a significant difference emerged between Q1 and Q4 (Mdiff=9.1, P=.009). For fatigue, a significant difference emerged between Q1 and Q4 (Mdiff=7.1, P=.05). Significant differences were also observed for between Q1 and Q3 (Mdiff=2.4, P=.041), and Q1 and Q4 (Mdiff=3.5, P=.002) for colorectal cancer-specific symptoms. There were no statistically significant associations of sedentary time with HRQoL, physical function and well-being, fatigue, or colorectal cancer-specific symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Objectively measured MVPA, but not sedentary time, was associated with better HRQoL, physical function and well-being, and colorectal cancer- specific symptoms in colon cancer survivors. For MVPA, differences met or exceeded contemporary cutpoints for determining clinically important differences.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
D'Silva, A.; Gardiner, P.; Boyle, Terry; Bebb, D.; Johnson, S.; Vallance, J. (2018)Objectives: No studies have examined objectively assessed physical activity, sedentary time, and patient-reported outcomes among lung cancer survivors. The objective of this study was to determine associations of objectively ...
-
Van Roekel, E.; Winkler, E.; Bours, M.; Lynch, B.; Willems, P.; Meijer, K.; Kant, I.; Beets, G.; Sanduleanu, S.; Healy, Genevieve; Weijenberg, M. (2016)Sedentary behavior (sitting/lying at low energy expenditure while awake) is emerging as an important risk factor that may compromise the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. We ...
-
Schofield, C.; Newton, R.; Cohen, P.; Galvão, D.; McVeigh, Joanne; Mohan, G.; Tan, J.; Salfinger, S.; Straker, Leon; Peddle-McIntyre, C. (2018)Purpose: Little is known about the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and modifiable lifestyle and physiological factors for ovarian cancer survivors (OCS). The ...