Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFenna, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T11:50:11Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T11:50:11Z
dc.date.created2011-04-07T20:01:19Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationFenna, Alan. 2010. Benchmarking in Federal Systems; John Curtin Institute of Public Policy (JCIPP) Working Paper, Curtin University, Forum of Federations.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15511
dc.description.abstract

Recent years have seen a rapidly growing interest in the use of benchmarking arrangements to improve policy performance in federal systems. This is a new development and one that is in its very early stages, but there is no doubting its significance. At issue here is the intersection of two things: a particular form of government and a particular form of management. Each is a complex matter in itself. How compatible is benchmarking with principles of federalism; and to what extent benchmarking can ‘add value’ to existing federal arrangements either by offering a superior mode of intergovernmental relations and/or by generating better substantive results for citizens? This paper looks at various benchmarking experiences in OECD-type federations and the European Union and draws tentative conclusions as to how complementary federalism and benchmarking might be.

dc.publisherForum of Federations
dc.subjectintergovernmental
dc.subjectfederal
dc.subjectperformance
dc.subjectOECD
dc.subjectpolicy
dc.subjectEurope
dc.subjectgovernment
dc.subjectBenchmarking
dc.subjectmanagement
dc.titleBenchmarking in Federal Systems
dc.typeWorking Paper
dcterms.source.volume6
dcterms.source.seriesOccasional Paper Series
curtin.departmentJohn Curtin Institute of Public Policy (JCIPP)
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record