Reasons for noncompliance with five-yearly screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
Access Status
Authors
Date
2008Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
Faculty
Collection
Abstract
Objective: To determine factors influencing the low return rate observed in a program of flexible sigmoidoscopy for average risk screening for colorectal carcinoma. Methods: Flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening of average risk 55-64 yr olds has been ongoing since 1995. Greater than 3400 primary and 1000 follow up screening examinations have been performed. Participants with a primary screen in 1997-1999 and eligible for rescreening in 2002-2004 were studied. A questionnaire assessing possible reasons for noncompliance was sent to subjects who did not attend the five year repeat screening. Results: 1672 primary screening flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed in 1997-1999 with 1362 being normal or having hyperplastic polyps only. The return rate was 45%: 48% of eligible males and 39% of eligible females had returned (p = 0.001 for difference). 709 questionnaires were mailed with a 50% response rate and 162 requests for repeat flexible sigmoidoscopy were generated. 27% of all respondents had undergone further bowel evaluation since the original normal sigmoidoscopy. Of eligible subjects who refused further screening, 65% did so because of concerns over procedural pain. Conclusions: Reasons for nonattendance relate to uptake of other bowel investigations and pain felt at initial screening. Return rate can be raised with ongoing prompting to attend screening. © 2008 Viiala and Olynyk, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Vanness, D.; Knudsen, A.; Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris; Rutter, C.; Gareen, I.; Herman, B.; Kuntz, K.; Zauber, A.; Van Ballegooijen, M.; Feuer, E.; Chen, M.; Johnson, C. (2011)Purpose: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk asymptomatic subjects in the United States aged 50 years. Materials and Methods: ...
-
Knudsen, A.; Zauber, A.; Rutter, C.; Naber, S.; Doria-Rose, V.; Pabiniak, C.; Johanson, C.; Fischer, S.; Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris; Kuntz, K. (2016)Importance: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is updating its 2008 colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Objective: To inform the USPSTF by modeling the benefits, burden, and harms of CRC screening ...
-
Van Hees, F.; Habbema, D.; Meester, R.; Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris; Van Ballegooijen, M.; Zauber, A. (2014)Background: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends against routine screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in adequately screened persons older than 75 years but does not address the appropriateness of screening ...