An Electronic Delphi Study to Establish Pediatric Intensive Care Nursing Research Priorities in Twenty European Countries
MetadataShow full item record
Objectives: To identify and to establish research priorities for pediatric intensive care nursing science across Europe. Design: A modified three-round electronic Delphi technique was applied. Questionnaires were translated into seven different languages. Setting: European PICUs. Participants: The participants included pediatric intensive care clinical nurses, managers, educators, and researchers. In round 1, the qualitative responses were analyzed by content analysis and a list of research statements and domains was generated. In rounds 2 and 3, the statements were ranked on a scale of one to six (not important to most important). Mean scores and SDs were calculated for rounds 2 and 3. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Round 1 started with 90 participants, with round 3 completed by 64 (71%). The seven highest ranking statements (≥ 5.0 mean score) were related to end-of-life care, decision making around forgoing and sustaining treatment, prevention of pain, education and competencies for pediatric intensive care nurses, reducing healthcare-associated infections, identifying appropriate nurse staffing levels, and implementing evidence into nursing practice. Nine research domains were prioritized, and these were as follows: 1) clinical nursing care practices, 2) pain and sedation, 3) quality and safety, 4) respiratory and mechanical ventilation, 5) child- and family-centered care, 6) ethics, 7) professional issues in nursing, 8) hemodynamcis and resuscitation, and 9) trauma and neurocritical care. Conclusions: The results of this study inform the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care’s nursing research agenda in the future. The results allow nurse researchers within Europe to encourage collaborative initiatives for nursing research.
This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 15 (5): pp. e206-e213.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Differences in the perceptions of parents and healthcare professionals on pediatric intensive care practicesLatour, Jos; Van Goudoever, J.; Duivenvoorden, H.; Albers, M.; Van Dam, N.; Dullaart, E.; Van Heerde, M.; De Neef, M.; Verlaat, C.; Van Vught, E.; Hazelzet, J. (2011)Objective: To explore similarities and differences in perceptions on pediatric intensive care practices between parents and staff by using data from two studies. Design: A two-round Delphi method among nurses and physicians ...
Blackwood, B.; Albarran, J.; Latour, Jos (2011)Aims: This paper is a report of a three round Delphi study of intensive care nursing research priorities in Europe (October 2006-April 2009). Background: Internationally, priorities for research in intensive care nursing ...
Tume, L.; Coetzee, M.; Dryden-Palmer, K.; Hickey, P.; Kinney, S.; Latour, Jos; Pedreira, M.; Sefton, G.; Sorce, L.; Curley, M. (2015)Objective: To identify and prioritize research questions of concern to the practice of pediatric critical care nursing practice. Design: One-day consensus conference. By using a conceptual framework by Benner et al ...