Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study
Access Status
Authors
Date
2022Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
School
Remarks
This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Poh, Pei-Fen RN, MSc; Sng, Qian Wen RN, BSc (Hons); Latour, Jos M. RN, PhD; He, Linxi RN, MSc; Fong, Mei Fung RN, BSc (Hons); Muralidharah, Jayashree MD, FCCM, FICCM, FIAP; Abbas, Qalab MBBS; Matsuishi, Yujiro RN, PhD; Lee, Jan Hau MBBS, MRCPCH, MCI; on behalf of Pediatric Acute & Critical Care Medicine Asian Network (PACCMAN). Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Research Priorities in Asia: An eDelphi Study*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 23(11):p e498-e506, November 2022. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003023.
Collection
Abstract
Objectives: To identify nursing research priorities in pediatric critical care in Asia. Design: We conducted a modified three-round eDelphi survey with pediatric critical care nurses in Asia. The eDelphi technique has been extensively used within health research to achieve a common viewpoint from experts using questionnaires to gather research priorities. In round 1, participants were asked to list three to five research topics that they deemed important. These topics were thematically analyzed and categorized into a questionnaire. Participants rated the research topics in round 2 on a 6-point scale (1 = not important to 6 = extremely important). In round 3, the same questionnaire was used with addition of the calculated mean scores from round 2 for each topic. Research topics ranked among the top 10 were considered extremely important. Settings: Twenty-two PICUs in eight Asian countries. SUBJECTS: Clinical nurses, managers, educators, and researchers. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: In round 1, 146 PICU nurses across eight countries provided 520 research topics. Topics from round 1 were categorized into seven domains with 52 research topics. Prioritized research topics included early recognition of patient deterioration (mean 5.58 ± 0.61), prevention of healthcare-associated infections (mean 5.47 ± 0.70), and interventions to reduce compassion fatigue (mean 5.45 ± 0.80). The top three research domains were end-of-life care (mean 5.34 ± 0.68), professionalism (mean 5.34 ± 0.69), and management of pain, sedation, and delirium (5.32 ± 0.72). Conclusions: This first PICU nursing research prioritization exercise within Asia identified key nursing research themes that should be prioritized and provide a framework for future collaborative studies.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Tume, L.; van den Hoogen, A.; Wielenga, J.; Latour, Jos (2014)Objectives: To identify and to establish research priorities for pediatric intensive care nursing science across Europe. Design: A modified three-round electronic Delphi technique was applied. Questionnaires were translated ...
-
Blackwood, B.; Albarran, J.; Latour, Jos (2011)Aims: This paper is a report of a three round Delphi study of intensive care nursing research priorities in Europe (October 2006-April 2009). Background: Internationally, priorities for research in intensive care nursing ...
-
Wielenga, J.; Tume, L.; Latour, Jos; van den Hoogen, A. (2015)Objective: This study aimed to identify and prioritise neonatal intensive care nursing research topics across Europe using an e-Delphi technique. Design: An e-Delphi technique with three questionnaire rounds was performed. ...