Can a Darwinian nomenclature help reconcile alternative perspectives of the dynamic capabilities view?
MetadataShow full item record
The confusion concerning the theoretical roots of the dynamic capabilities view and the fact that it was often being positioned as an extension to the resource-based view in strategic management, prompted a paper by Galvin, Rice, and Liao (2014) that suggested that the dynamic capabilities view would benefit from adopting a more explicit Darwinian approach. In response to this paper, Arndt and Bach (2015) highlighted that the seminal papers in the field do indeed take an evolutionary perspective and that in operationalizing the variation–selection–retention cycle in an empirical setting it is necessary to move away from firm performance as a dependent variable and instead use survival, which more closely aligns with the concept of natural selection. In this paper, we respond to this recent critique to articulate the benefits of a Darwinian nomenclature and how this will assist in positioning the dynamic capabilities view as an independent, though complementary, theory to the resource-based view. However, we do clearly recognize that until the key terms of variation, selection and retention can be operationalized at the routine, firm and industry level, such an approach may not in itself bring the field towards a common understanding of how dynamic capabilities operate in different environments.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Galvin, Peter; Rice, J.; Liao, T. (2014)The Darwinian logic of evolution occurring via the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention provides a possible theoretical framework from which to further develop the dynamic capabilities view. Presently, criticized ...
Bititci, U.; Ackermann, Fran; Ates, A.; Davies, J.; Garengo, P.; Gibb, S.; MacBryde, J.; Mackay, D.; Maguire, C.; van der Meer, R.; Shafti, F.; Bourne, M.; Firat, S. (2011)Purpose – It is argued that whilst operational and support processes deliver performance presently, it is the managerial processes that sustain performance over time. The purpose of this research paper is to better ...
A practical real option methodology for the evaluation of farm-in/out joint venture agreements in mineral explorationGuj, Pietro (2011)Although the “real option valuation” (ROV) methodology offers extremely valuable insights in optimising investment decisions in the face of uncertainty, its practical acceptance in the mining industry has until recently ...