The Unfulfilled Promise of Online Deliberation
MetadataShow full item record
Since online deliberation has not delivered on the expectations of more considered, democratic participation, the authors propose less focus on technological ‘fixes’ and more on re-conceptualizing its primary purpose to gathering resonance in an authentic public square. The ideas that emerge can then be deliberated in representative face-to-face public deliberations, with the coherent voice that results contributing to more inclusive, legitimate, and implementable democratic decision-making.
Copyright © 2015 Public Deliberation
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Risk factors for repetition of a deliberate self-harm episode within seven days in adolescents and young adults: A population-level record linkage study in Western AustraliaHu, N.; Glauert, R.; Li, Jianghong; Taylor, C. (2016)Objective: The risk of repetition of deliberate self-harm peaks in the first 7 days after a deliberate self-harm episode. However, thus far no studies have examined the risk factors for repeating deliberate self-harm ...
A mixed method study to determine the attitude of Australian emergency health professionals towards patients who present with deliberate self-poisoningMartin, C.; Chapman, Rose (2014)Introduction: Deliberate self-poisoning is one of the frequent presentation types to emergency departments. It has been reported that attitudes of emergency staff may have negative consequences for the wellbeing of the ...
Molster, C.; Maxwell, Susannah; Youngs, L.; Potts, A.; Kyne, G.; Hope, F.; Dawkins, Hugh; O'Leary, Peter (2012)Background: Deliberative public engagement is recommended for policy development in contested ethical areas. Scholars provide little guidance on how deliberative outputs can be translated to policy. This paper describes ...