Understanding Deliberative Citizens: The Application of Q Methodology to Deliberation on Policy Issues
Access Status
Authors
Date
2013Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Collection
Abstract
This article argues that deliberation provides a suitable method for understanding what the public ideally wants when it comes to decision making. Q methodology provides the basis for an ideal approach for understanding what is happening during deliberation and for developing a deeper understanding of the choices being made. The approach reported in this article involves using Q sorting in conjunction with a survey of policy preferences, both administered before and after deliberation. The focus is a deliberative process conducted to decide the future of the ageing Fremantle Bridge, where the issue involved conflicting values. The Q analysis revealed three main positions (factors) in relation to the issue, each tending to correspond to different kinds of options for replacing the bridge. Overall, deliberation resulted in a move away from concern about the heritage value of the old bridge and toward a safety-oriented position. There was also a corresponding change in preference in favour of options that participants believed would improve safety. The approach provides information that is useful for policy making because it identifies the main reasons driving the formation of public opinion and the circumstances in which opinions change when the public is given the chance to fully reflect on the outcome.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Davcik, N.; Sharma, Piyush ; Chan, R.; Roy, R. (2019)Purpose – The purpose of this editorial is to present the contemporary thinking on deliberate lookalikes and to provide a better understanding of its key forms (counterfeits, copycats, and no-name imitations) and markets ...
-
Hartz-Karp, Janette; Anderson, Patrick; Gasti, J.; Felicetti, A. (2010)Active citizen participation is increasingly being recognized as essential to effective public policymaking. A key challenge for public administrators is how to effectively engage constituents' diverse viewpoints in sound ...
-
Hu, N.; Glauert, R.; Li, Jianghong; Taylor, C. (2016)Objective: The risk of repetition of deliberate self-harm peaks in the first 7 days after a deliberate self-harm episode. However, thus far no studies have examined the risk factors for repeating deliberate self-harm ...