Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSun, Zhonghua
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Yvonne
dc.contributor.authorMwipatayi, B.
dc.contributor.authorHartley, D.
dc.contributor.authorLawrence-Brown, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T12:49:48Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T12:49:48Z
dc.date.created2009-03-05T00:58:05Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationSun, Zhonghua and Allen, Yvonne and Mwipatayi, Bibombe and Hartley, David and Lawrence-Brown, Michael. 2008. Multislice CT angiography in the follow-up of fenestrated endovascular grafts: Effect of slice thickness on 2D and 3D visualization of the fenestrated stents. Journal of Endovascular Therapy 15 (4): pp. 417-426.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/25715
dc.description.abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of multislice computed tomography (CT) protocols on the visualization of target vessel stents in patients with treated with fenestrated endovascular grafts.Methods: Twenty-one patients (19 men; mean age 75 years, range 63?86) undergoing fenestrated endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were retrospectively studied. Multislice CT angiography was performed with several protocols, and the section thicknesses used in each were compared to identify any relationship between slice thickness and target vessel stents visualized on 2-dimensional (2D) axial, multiplanar reformatted (MPR), and 3-dimensional (3D) virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images. Image quality was assessed based on the degree of artifacts and their effect on the ability to visualize the configuration, intra-aortic location, and intraluminal appearance of the target vessel stents and measure their protrusion into the aortic lumen.Results: There were 7 different multislice CT scanning protocols employed in the 21 patients (25 datasets, with 2 sets of follow-up images in 4 patients). The slice thicknesses and numbers (n) of studies included were 0.5 (n=3), 0.625 (n=6), 1.0 (n=1), 1.25 (n=9), 2.5 (n=3), 3.0 (n=1), and 5.0 mm (n=2). Of these CT protocols, images (especially 2D/3D reconstructions) acquired at 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm were significantly compromised by interference from artifacts. Images acquired with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm were scored equally or lower than those acquired with a submillimeter section thickness (0.5 or 0.625 mm), with minor degrees of artifacts resulting in acceptable image quality.Conclusion: Visualization of the target vessel stents depends on the appropriate selection of multislice CT scanning protocols. Our results showed that studies performed with a slice thickness of 1.0 or 1.25 mm produced similar image quality to those with a thickness of 0.5 or 0.625 mm. Submillimeter slices are not recommended in imaging patients treated with fenestrated stent-grafts, as they did not add additional information to the visualization.

dc.publisherInternational Society of Endovascular Specialists
dc.subjectvisualization
dc.subjectimage quality
dc.subjectsurveillance
dc.subjectfenestrated stent-graft
dc.subjectendovascular aneurysm repair
dc.subjectslice thickness
dc.subjectmultislice computed tomography
dc.titleMultislice CT angiography in the follow-up of fenestrated endovascular grafts: Effect of slice thickness on 2D and 3D visualization of the fenestrated stents
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume15
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage417
dcterms.source.endPage426
dcterms.source.issn1526-6028
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Endovascular Therapy
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Computing
curtin.facultySchool of Science and Computing
curtin.facultyDepartment of Computing
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record