Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCzernichow, S.
dc.contributor.authorKengne, A.
dc.contributor.authorHuxley, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorBatty, G.
dc.contributor.authorDe Galan, B.
dc.contributor.authorGrobbee, D.
dc.contributor.authorPillai, A.
dc.contributor.authorZoungas, S.
dc.contributor.authorMarre, M.
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, M.
dc.contributor.authorNeal, B.
dc.contributor.authorChalmers, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:00:50Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:00:50Z
dc.date.created2016-02-04T19:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationCzernichow, S. and Kengne, A. and Huxley, R. and Batty, G. and De Galan, B. and Grobbee, D. and Pillai, A. et al. 2011. Comparison of waist-to-hip ratio and other obesity indices as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in people with type-2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study from ADVANCE. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. 18 (2): pp. 312-319.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/27732
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HJR.0b013e32833c1aa3
dc.description.abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the strength of associations and discrimination capability of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with type-2 diabetes. Methods and results: Eleven thousand, one hundred and forty men and women were followed for a mean of 4.8 years. The Cox proportional hazard models were used to compute the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for one standard deviation (SD) increase in baseline BMI (SD: 5kg/m2), WC (SD: 13cm) and WHR (SD: 0.08) with cardiovascular disease risk. After adjustment, hazard ratio (95% CI) for WC were 1.10 (1.03-1.18) for cardiovascular events, 1.13 (1.03-1.24) for coronary events, and 1.08 (0.98-1.19) for cardiovascular deaths. Estimates for WHR were 1.12 (1.05-1.19), 1.17 (1.08-1.28) and 1.19 (1.09-1.31). BMI was not related to any of these outcomes. Although the receiver operating characteristic curve could not differentiate between anthropometric variables (P values = 0.24), the relative integrated discrimination improvement statistic showed an enhancement in the discrimination capabilities of models using WHR for cardiovascular outcomes, except for cerebrovascular events. Conclusion: Strengths of associations and discrimination statistics suggested that WHR was the best predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes and BMI the worst. © The European Society of Cardiology 2011.

dc.titleComparison of waist-to-hip ratio and other obesity indices as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in people with type-2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study from ADVANCE
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume18
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage312
dcterms.source.endPage319
dcterms.source.issn1741-8267
dcterms.source.titleEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record