Reputation ontology for reputation systems
dc.contributor.author | Chang, Elizabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Hussain, Farookh | |
dc.contributor.author | Dillon, Tharam S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T13:05:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T13:05:13Z | |
dc.date.created | 2008-11-12T23:32:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chang, Elizabeth and Hussain, Farookh and Dillon, Tharam. 2006. : Reputation ontology for reputation systems, in Meersman, R. and Tari, Z. and Herrero, P. (ed), 2nd IFIP WG 2.12 & WG 12.4 International Workshop on Web Semantics (SWWS) in conjunction with OTM 2006, Oct 29 2006, pp. 1724-1733. Montpellier, France: Springer-Verlag. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/28458 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/11575863_117 | |
dc.description.abstract |
The growing development of web-based reputation systems in the 21st century will have a powerful social and economic impact on both business entities and individual customers, because it makes transparent quality assessment on products and services to achieve customer assurance in the distributed web-based Reputation Systems. The web-based reputation systems will be the foundation for web intelligence in the future. Trust and Reputation help capture business intelligence through establishing customer trust relationships, learning consumer behaviour, capturing market reaction on products and services, disseminating customer feedback, buyers' opinions and end-user recommendations. It also reveals dishonest services, unfair trading, biased assessment, discriminatory actions, fraudulent behaviours, and un-true advertising. The continuing development of these technologies will help in the improvement of professional business behaviour, sales, reputation of sellers, providers, products and services. Given the importance of reputation in this paper, we propose ontology for reputation. In the business world we can consider the reputation of a product or the reputation of a service or the reputation of an agent. In this paper we propose ontology for these entities that can help us unravel the components and conceptualise the components of reputation of each of the entities. | |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | |
dc.subject | business intelligence | |
dc.subject | customer feedback | |
dc.subject | trust relationships | |
dc.subject | ontologies | |
dc.subject | trust | |
dc.subject | ontology | |
dc.subject | agent | |
dc.subject | fraudulent behaviour | |
dc.subject | web intelligence | |
dc.subject | trusting agent | |
dc.subject | reputation systems | |
dc.subject | reputation | |
dc.subject | trusted agent | |
dc.title | Reputation ontology for reputation systems | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 1724 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 1733 | |
dcterms.source.title | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS-4278) - On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops | |
dcterms.source.series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS-4278) - On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops | |
dcterms.source.conference | 2nd IFIP WG 2.12 & WG 12.4 International Workshop on Web Semantics (SWWS) in conjunction with OTM 2006 | |
dcterms.source.conference-start-date | Oct 29 2006 | |
dcterms.source.conferencelocation | Montpellier, France | |
dcterms.source.place | USA | |
curtin.department | Centre for Extended Enterprises and Business Intelligence | |
curtin.identifier | EPR-1277 | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available | |
curtin.faculty | Curtin Business School |