Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKatzenellenbogen, Judith
dc.contributor.authorSanfilippo, F.
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, M.
dc.contributor.authorBriffa, T.
dc.contributor.authorRidout, S.
dc.contributor.authorKnuiman, M.
dc.contributor.authorDimer, L.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Kate
dc.contributor.authorThompson, P.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:13:47Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:13:47Z
dc.date.created2011-03-06T20:01:30Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationKatzenellenbogen, Judith M. and Sanfilippo, Frank M. and Hobbs, Michael S.T. and Briffa, Tom G. and Ridout, Steve C. and Knuiman, Matthew W. and Dimer, Lyn and Taylor, Kate P. and Thompson, Peter L. and Thompson, Sandra C. 2011. Variable effects of prevalence correction of population denominators on differentials in myocardial infarction incidence: a record linkage study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Western Australians. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 64 (6): pp. 658-666.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/29565
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.008
dc.description.abstract

Objectives. To investigate the impact of prevalence correction of population denominators on myocardial infarction (MI) incidence rates, rate ratios, and rate differences in Aboriginal vs. non-Aboriginal Western Australians aged 25–74 years during the study period 2000–2004.Study Design and Setting. Person-based linked hospital and mortality data sets were used to estimate the number of prevalent and first-ever MI cases each year from 2000 to 2004 using a 15-year look-back period. Age-specific and -standardized MI incidence rates were calculated using both prevalence-corrected and -uncorrected population denominators, by sex and Aboriginality.Results. The impact of prevalence correction on rates increased with age, was higher for men than women, and substantially greater for Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal people. Despite the systematic underestimation of incidence, prevalence correction had little impact on the Aboriginal to non-Aboriginal age-standardized rate ratios (6% and 4% underestimate in men and women, respectively), although the impact on rate differences was more marked (12% and 6%, respectively). The percentage underestimate of differentials was greater at older ages. Conclusion. Prevalence correction of denominators, while more accurate, is difficult to apply and may add modestly to the quantification of relative disparities in MI incidence between populations. Absolute incidence disparities using uncorrected denominators may have an error >10%.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectHealth inequalities
dc.subjectLinked data
dc.subjectAboriginal
dc.subjectPrevalence correction
dc.subjectMyocardial infarction
dc.titleVariable effects of prevalence-correction of population denominators on differentials in myocardial infarction incidence: a record linkage study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Western Australians
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volumeNovember
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage9
dcterms.source.issn08954356
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
curtin.departmentCentre for International Health (Curtin Research Centre)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record