Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarz, T.
dc.contributor.authorLange, J.
dc.contributor.authorMelloh, Markus
dc.contributor.authorStaub, L.
dc.contributor.authorMerk, H.
dc.contributor.authorKlöting, I.
dc.contributor.authorFollak, N.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:41:24Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:41:24Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T04:26:11Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBarz, T. and Lange, J. and Melloh, M. and Staub, L. and Merk, H. and Klöting, I. and Follak, N. 2013. Histomorphometric and radiographical changes after lumbar implantation of the PEEK nonfusion interspinous device in the BB.4S rat model. Spine. 38 (5): pp. E263-E269.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/34137
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BRS.0b013e318280c710
dc.description.abstract

STUDY DESIGN. An experimental animal study. OBJECTIVE. To investigate histomorphometric and radiographical changes in the BB.4S rat model after PEEK (polyetheretherketone) nonfusion interspinous device implantation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Clinical effectiveness of the PEEK nonfusion spine implant Wallis (Abbott, Bordeaux, France; now Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is well documented. However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term effects of this implant on bone, in particular its influence on structural changes of bone elements of the lumbar spine. METHODS. Twenty-four male BB.4S rats aged 11 weeks underwent surgery for implantation of a PEEK nonfusion interspinous device or for a sham procedure in 3 groups of 8 animals each: 1) implantation at level L4-L5; 2) implantation at level L5-L6; and 3) sham surgery. Eleven weeks postoperatively osteolyses at the implant-bone interface were measured via radiograph, bone mineral density of vertebral bodies was analyzed using osteodensitometry, and bone mineral content as well as resorption of the spinous processes were examined by histomorphometry. RESULTS. Resorption of the spinous processes at the site of the interspinous implant was found in all treated segments. There was no significant difference in either bone density of vertebral bodies or histomorphometric structure of the spinous processes between adjacent vertebral bodies, between treated and untreated segments and between groups. CONCLUSION. These findings indicate that resorption of spinous processes because of a result of implant loosening, inhibit the targeted load redistribution through the PEEK nonfusion interspinous device in the lumbar spinal segment of the rat. This leads to reduced long-term stability of the implant in the animal model. These results suggest that PEEK nonfusion interspinous devices like the Wallis implants may have time-limited effects and should only be used for specified indications. © 2013, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

dc.titleHistomorphometric and radiographical changes after lumbar implantation of the PEEK nonfusion interspinous device in the BB.4S rat model
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume38
dcterms.source.number5
dcterms.source.startPageE263
dcterms.source.endPageE269
dcterms.source.issn0362-2436
dcterms.source.titleSpine
curtin.departmentCurtin Medical School
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record