Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDesai, Chirag
dc.contributor.authorWood, F.
dc.contributor.authorSchug, S.
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Richard
dc.contributor.authorFridlender, C.
dc.contributor.authorSunderland, Vivian Bruce
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:58:10Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:58:10Z
dc.date.created2014-01-22T20:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationDesai, Chiragkumar and Wood, Fiona M. and Schug, Stephan A. and Parsons, Richard W. and Fridlender, Charles and Sunderland, Vivian Bruce. 2014. Effectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation. Burns. 40 (1): pp. 106-112.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/36859
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.burns.2013.05.013
dc.description.abstract

Background: Partial thickness skin graft wounds are painful. Topically applied lidocaine has been used for analgesia in several clinical trials. This study compared the effectiveness of two different formulations of topical local anaesthetic for dressing changes of partial thickness skin graft donor sites.Methods: A double-blind randomised controlled, pilot trial was conducted in 29 patients undergoing split thickness skin graft surgery. Subjects were randomised to either a 3% lidocaine emulsion formulation ‘‘Treatment E’’ (NOPAYNETM) or a 4% aqueous solution ‘‘Treatment A’’ (XylocaineTM). Subjects received one spray per 3 cm2 of donor site area followed by up to two further spays as required. Endpoints included pain intensity measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) up to 1 h after dressing change commencement, sting sensation, overall satisfaction and lidocaine plasma concentration.Results: The 60 min pain scores for E and A were 1.3 ±0.3 (mean ±SEM) and 1.8 ±0.4 (ƿ = 0.98) respectively. Nearly 90% of patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The mean plasma concentrations of lidocaine for A and E were 0.132 mg/l and 0.040 mg/l respectively (ƿ = 0.069).Conclusion: The topical local anaesthetic formulations achieved low pain scores during dressing changes. The safety profile was potentially improved with the emulsion formulation of lidocaine.

dc.publisherPergamon
dc.subjectBurns
dc.subjectLidocaine spray
dc.subjectEmulsion
dc.subjectPartial thickness skin graft
dc.subjectLocal anaesthetic formulation
dc.subjectLidocaine
dc.subjectSkin graft wound
dc.subjectDonor site dressing change
dc.subjectBurn pain
dc.titleEffectiveness of a topical local anaesthetic spray as analgesia for dressing changes: A double-blinded randomised pilot trial comparing an emulsion with an aqueous lidocaine formulation
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume40
dcterms.source.startPage106
dcterms.source.endPage112
dcterms.source.issn0305-4179
dcterms.source.titleBurns
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record