Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSilberstein, Morry
dc.identifier.citationSilberstein, M. 2013. Is acupuncture "stimulation" a misnomer? A case for using the term " blockade". BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 13.

Background: The term used most frequently in the literature to describe acupuncture's effects is " stimulation" which may be used to describe either (or both) the direct stimulus applied to a needle as well as putative stimulation of the nervous system, despite little published evidence describing what is actually being stimulated. In contrast, recent published work has suggested that acupuncture may, in fact be inhibitory at a peripheral level, acting by blocking neural transmission.Discussion: The suggestion that acupuncture exerts its effects through peripheral neural blockade is supported by recent evidence explaining related techniques including low level laser and capsaicin at acupoints. It also explains acupuncture's effect on painful and non-painful conditions and both Eastern and Western concepts of acupuncture. There is a need for additional work to elucidate acupuncture's mechanism of action, and the suggestion that it acts through neural blockade should prompt further research in this direction.Summary: If the term " blockade" were applied to acupuncture, this would, likely, be expected to promote this minimally invasive technique, and, potentially, bring it into mainstream clinical practice for pain management as well as other therapeutic applications. © 2013 Silberstein; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.titleIs acupuncture "stimulation" a misnomer? A case for using the term " blockade"
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
curtin.departmentDepartment of Chemistry
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record