Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNorth, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorHargreaves, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:48:11Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:48:11Z
dc.date.created2013-09-11T20:00:28Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationNorth, Adrian C. and Hargreaves, David J. 2002. Age variations in judgments of ‘great’ art works. British Journal of Psychology. 93: pp. 397-405.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/41107
dc.identifier.doi10.1348/000712602760146431
dc.description.abstract

This paper reports the results of two large-scale surveys concerning nominations of ‘greatness’ in the arts. In Study 1, 1088 respondents to a national newspaper survey nominated the greatest art works of the past 1000 years. Analyses indicated that there was some, albeit limited, evidence that older respondents nominated older art works, but no evidence of a tendency to nominate works produced during the participants’ adolescence/early adulthood. In Study 2, a very brief questionnaire distributed through a CD retail chain, a national newspaper, and a national TV station asked 12,502 participants to nominate up to three of the greatest pop musicians of all time. Analyses indicated a tendency to nominate musicians who were successful while the participants themselves were in adolescence/early adulthood. These results are discussed in terms of the extent to which age can explain judgments of artistic ‘greatness’ within different art forms.

dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.titleAge variations in judgments of ‘great’ art works
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume93
dcterms.source.startPage397
dcterms.source.endPage405
dcterms.source.issn0007-1269
dcterms.source.titleBritish Journal of Psychology
curtin.departmentof Technlogy
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record