Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Leary, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, S.
dc.contributor.authorSinosich, M.
dc.contributor.authorDeVoss, K.
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, J.
dc.contributor.authorRanieri, E.
dc.contributor.authorMetz, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:36:37Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:36:37Z
dc.date.created2016-02-01T00:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationO'Leary, P. and Maxwell, S. and Sinosich, M. and DeVoss, K. and Fletcher, J. and Ranieri, E. and Metz, M. 2016. Screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gymaecology. 56 (1): pp. 19-21.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4130
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajo.12411
dc.description.abstract

Antenatal screening for fetal anomalies has provided women and their partners with information to make reproductive choices based on the risk of serious chromosomal or structural defects since the 1990s. Alternative tests include first-trimester screening (combined ultrasound and maternal serum markers), second-trimester maternal serum markers and noninvasive cell-free DNA testing. The recent recommendations by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the Human Genetics Society of Australasia against second-trimester triple testing are based on unsound performance criteria, raise several contestable issues around access and equity and challenge the principles of governments providing affordable options.

dc.titleScreening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volumePre Press
dcterms.source.titleAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
curtin.departmentHealth Sciences Research and Graduate Studies
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record