View Item 

Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution

Access Status
Fulltext not available
Authors
Thomas, M.
McClelland, J.
Richardson, F.
Schapiro, A.
Baughman, Frank
Date
2009
Type
Book Chapter

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Thomas, M. and McClelland, J. and Richardson, F. and Schapiro, A. and Baughman, F. 2009. Dynamic and Connectionist Approaches to Development: Toward a Future of Mutually Beneficial Coevolution. In Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider: Oxford University Press.
Source Title
Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider
DOI
ISBN
School
School of Psychology and Speech Pathology
URI
Collection
Abstract

© 2009 by John P. Spencer, Michael S. C. Thomas, and James L. McClelland. All rights reserved.A tension has existed between connectionism and dynamic systems theory (DST), and this chapter considers why this should be the case. The chapter argues that much of the tension arises from a tenet that the two approaches share: they both rely on the explicit, quantitative instantiation of ideas in mathematical or computational models. The use of such models is responsible for much of the theoretical progress generated by connectionism and DST beyond the theories of good old-fashioned cognitive development (GOFCD). But the use of explicit, quantitative models brings with it a new set of problems. The chapter discusses several consequences of the use of such models and considers three points of apparent disagreement between connectionism and DST.