The Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde
Access Status
Authors
Date
2015Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
School
Remarks
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Annals of Occupational Hygiene following peer review. The version of record: Driscoll, T., Carey, R., Peters, S., Glass, D., Benke, G. ,Reid, A. and Fritschi, L. 2015. The Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 60 (1): pp. 132-138 is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev058
Collection
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to formaldehyde, to identify the main circumstances of exposure and to describe the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures. METHODS: The analysis used data from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey, which investigated the current prevalence and exposure circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including formaldehyde, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures. RESULTS: Of the 4993 included respondents, 124 (2.5%) were identified as probably being exposed to formaldehyde in the course of their work [extrapolated to 2.6% of the Australian working population-265 000 (95% confidence interval 221 000-316 000) workers]. Most (87.1%) were male. About half worked in technical and trades occupations. In terms of industry, about half worked in the construction industry. The main circumstances of exposure were working with particle board or plywood typically through carpentry work, building maintenance, or sanding prior to painting; with the more common of other exposures circumstances being firefighters involved in fighting fires, fire overhaul, and clean-up or back-burning; and health workers using formaldehyde when sterilizing equipment or in a pathology laboratory setting. The use of control measures was inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Workers are exposed to formaldehyde in many different occupational circumstances. Information on the exposure circumstances can be used to support decisions on appropriate priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to formaldehyde, and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to formaldehyde.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Driscoll, T.; Carey, Renee; Peters, S.; Glass, D.; Benke, G.; Reid, Alison; Fritschi, Lin (2015)INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), to identify the main circumstances of exposure and ...
-
Driscoll, T.; Carey, Renee; Peters, S.; Glass, D.; Benke, G.; Reid, Alison; Fritschi, Lin (2015)INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to lead and its compounds, to identify the main circumstances of exposures, and to collect ...
-
Si, Si; Carey, R.; Reid, A.; Driscoll, T.; Glass, D.; Peters, S.; Benke, G.; Darcey, E.; Fritschi, L. (2016)Background: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is a biologically active dust that can accumulate in the lung and induce silicosis and lung cancer. Despite occupational exposure being the predominant source, no study has ...