Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, T.
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Renee
dc.contributor.authorPeters, S.
dc.contributor.authorGlass, D.
dc.contributor.authorBenke, G.
dc.contributor.authorReid, Alison
dc.contributor.authorFritschi, Lin
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T14:57:23Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T14:57:23Z
dc.date.created2015-12-10T04:25:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationDriscoll, T. and Carey, R. and Peters, S. and Glass, D. and Benke, G. and Reid, A. and Fritschi, L. 2015. The Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 60 (1): pp. 132-138.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/42100
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annhyg/mev058
dc.description.abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to produce a population-based estimate of the prevalence of work-related exposure to formaldehyde, to identify the main circumstances of exposure and to describe the use of workplace control measures designed to decrease those exposures. METHODS: The analysis used data from the Australian Workplace Exposures Study, a nationwide telephone survey, which investigated the current prevalence and exposure circumstances of work-related exposure to 38 known or suspected carcinogens, including formaldehyde, among Australian workers aged 18-65 years. Using the web-based tool OccIDEAS, semi-quantitative information was collected about exposures in the current job held by the respondent. Questions were addressed primarily at tasks undertaken rather than about self-reported exposures. RESULTS: Of the 4993 included respondents, 124 (2.5%) were identified as probably being exposed to formaldehyde in the course of their work [extrapolated to 2.6% of the Australian working population-265 000 (95% confidence interval 221 000-316 000) workers]. Most (87.1%) were male. About half worked in technical and trades occupations. In terms of industry, about half worked in the construction industry. The main circumstances of exposure were working with particle board or plywood typically through carpentry work, building maintenance, or sanding prior to painting; with the more common of other exposures circumstances being firefighters involved in fighting fires, fire overhaul, and clean-up or back-burning; and health workers using formaldehyde when sterilizing equipment or in a pathology laboratory setting. The use of control measures was inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Workers are exposed to formaldehyde in many different occupational circumstances. Information on the exposure circumstances can be used to support decisions on appropriate priorities for intervention and control of occupational exposure to formaldehyde, and estimates of burden of cancer arising from occupational exposure to formaldehyde.

dc.titleThe Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleAnn Occup Hyg
curtin.note

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Annals of Occupational Hygiene following peer review. The version of record: Driscoll, T., Carey, R., Peters, S., Glass, D., Benke, G. ,Reid, A. and Fritschi, L. 2015. The Australian Work Exposures Study: Prevalence of Occupational Exposure to Formaldehyde. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 60 (1): pp. 132-138 is available online at: http://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev058

curtin.departmentEpidemiology and Biostatistics
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record