A collective, undifferentiated accounting profession: an Australian study
dc.contributor.author | Inglis, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Shelly, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Morley, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | De Lange, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T15:10:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T15:10:20Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-11-19T01:13:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Inglis, R. and Shelly, M. and Morley, C. and De Lange, P. 2011. A collective, undifferentiated accounting profession: an Australian study. Accounting and Finance. 51 (3): pp. 711-731. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/43823 | |
dc.description.abstract |
A study of 386 potential and current members of the accounting profession inAustralia and South-East Asia provides evidence of the importance of threeattributes – brand/reputation, international recognition of qualifications andcareer opportunities – in the decision to join a professional accounting body.While these attributes are important, logit regression models indicate that theyare not discriminatory in the choice of professional body and suggest a perceptionof a collective, undifferentiated accounting profession. The marketing ofbrand/reputation and membership benefits may be a more efficient and effectivestrategy in attracting members and differentiating the profession if undertakenby a combined or coordinated professional body. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia | |
dc.subject | Differentiation | |
dc.subject | Brand | |
dc.subject | Professional - accounting bodies | |
dc.subject | Membership | |
dc.subject | Accounting | |
dc.title | A collective, undifferentiated accounting profession: an Australian study | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 51 | |
dcterms.source.number | 3 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 711 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 731 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0810-5391 | |
dcterms.source.title | Accounting and Finance | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |