Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCordier, Reinie
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y.
dc.contributor.authorSpeyer, R.
dc.contributor.authorTotino, R.
dc.contributor.authorDoma, K.
dc.contributor.authorLeicht, A.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, N.
dc.contributor.authorCuomo, B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:39:25Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:39:25Z
dc.date.created2016-08-28T19:30:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationCordier, R. and Chen, Y. and Speyer, R. and Totino, R. and Doma, K. and Leicht, A. and Brown, N. et al. 2016. Child-report measures of occupational performance: A systematic review. PLoS One. 11 (1): pp. 1-24.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4469
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0147751
dc.description.abstract

© Copyright 2016 Cordier et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction Improving occupational performance is a key service of occupational therapists and client-centred approach to care is central to clinical practice. As such it is important to comprehensively evaluate the quality of psychometric properties reported across measures of occupational performance; in order to guide assessment and treatment planning. Objective To systematically review the literature on the psychometric properties of child-report measures of occupational performance for children ages 2-18 years. Methods A systematic search of the following six electronic databases was conducted: CINAHL; Psy-cINFO; EMBASE; PubMed; the Health and Psychosocial Instruments (HAPI) database; and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was evaluated against the COSMIN taxonomy of measurement properties and the overall quality of psychometric properties was evaluated using pre-set psychometric criteria. Results Fifteen articles and one manual were reviewed to assess the psychometric properties of the six measures-the PEGS, MMD, CAPE, PAC, COSA, and OSA- which met the inclusion criteria. Most of the measures had conducted good quality studies to evaluate the psychometric properties of measures (PEGS, CAPE, PAC, OSA); however, the quality of the studies for two of these measures was relatively weak (MMD, COSA). When integrating the quality of the psychometric properties of the measures with the quality of the studies, the PAC stood out as having superior psychometric qualities. Conclusions The overall quality of the psychometric properties of most measures was limited. There is a need for continuing research into the psychometric properties of child-report measures of occupational performance, and to revise and improve the psychometric properties of existing measures.

dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.titleChild-report measures of occupational performance: A systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume11
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage24
dcterms.source.titlePLoS One
curtin.note

This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

curtin.departmentSchool of Occupational Therapy and Social Work
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record