Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNelson, M.
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, E.
dc.contributor.authorDoust, J.
dc.contributor.authorReid, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorWing, L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:19:24Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:19:24Z
dc.date.created2015-11-04T20:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationNelson, M. and Chowdhury, E. and Doust, J. and Reid, C. and Wing, L. 2015. Ten-year legacy effects of baseline blood pressure 'treatment naivety' in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study. Journal of Hypertension. 33 (11): pp. 2331-2337.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45226
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HJH.0000000000000709
dc.description.abstract

© 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Objectives: Current blood pressure (BP) management guidelines recommend that treatment thresholds for BP be based on absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk rather than on elevated BP levels alone. Clinicians are concerned that delayed pharmacotherapy in individuals with high BP, but low CVD risk, may increase long-term CVD events. To investigate this, we examined differences in CVD events within the Second Australian National BP study (ANBP2) for those previously on pharmacotherapy and those who were not, as well as fatal events in the 6-year post-trial period. Methods: Population consisted of ANBP2 participants without a prior CVD event. Adjusted Cox-regression hazard models were used to assess the effects of prior BP pharmacotherapy use on cardiovascular endpoints within ANBP2. An extended 6-year follow-up analysis for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was also conducted. Results: We found a higher in-trial CVD and all-cause mortality rate and incidence of new-onset diabetes for those on previous treatment versus those who were treatment-naive. We investigated whether this was an effect of the in-trial protocol, but this did not explain the observed differences. No difference in CVD or all-cause mortality at 10 years was observed between 'treatment-naive' and 'previous treatment' groups. Conclusion: We found no long-term adverse mortality associated with treatment naivety of elevated BP in an elderly hypertensive cohort, but this finding is likely to be confounded as seen by the lower in-trial mortality in the 'treatment-naive' group. Legacy effects need to be explored in randomized trials of middle-aged populations where the clinical concern lies.

dc.titleTen-year legacy effects of baseline blood pressure 'treatment naivety' in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume33
dcterms.source.number11
dcterms.source.startPage2331
dcterms.source.endPage2337
dcterms.source.issn0263-6352
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Hypertension
curtin.departmentDepartment of Health Policy and Management
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record