Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavis, E.
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, K.
dc.contributor.authorMullan, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorJuraskova, I.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:33:43Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:33:43Z
dc.date.created2016-02-10T19:30:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2016-02-11
dc.identifier.citationDavis, E. and McCaffery, K. and Mullan, B. and Juraskova, I. 2015. An exploration of decision aid effectiveness: The impact of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on a health-related decision. Health Expectations. 18 (6): pp. 2742-2752.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47490
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hex.12248
dc.description.abstract

Background: Decision aids (DAs) are non-directive communication tools that help patients make value-consistent health-care decisions. However, most DAs have been developed without an explicit theoretical framework, resulting in a lack of understanding of how DAs achieve outcomes. Objective: To investigate the effect of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on DA effectiveness based on dual-process theory. Design, setting and participants: One hundred and forty-eight female university students participated in a randomized controlled experiment with three conditions: emotion-focused, information-focused and control. Preference-value consistency, knowledge, decisional conflict and satisfaction were compared across the conditions using planned contrast analyses. Intervention: The intervention comprised two different DAs and instructional manipulations. The emotion-focused condition received a modified DA with affective content and instructions to induce an affective reaction. The information-focused and control conditions received the same DA without the affective content. The information-focused condition received additional instructions to induce deliberative processing. Results: Controlling for the experiment-wise error rate at P < 0.017, the emotion-focused and information-focused conditions had significantly higher decisional satisfaction than the control condition (P < 0.001). The emotion-focused condition did not demonstrate preference-value consistency. There were no significant differences for decisional conflict and knowledge. Discussion: Results suggest that the promotion of affective processing may hinder value-consistent decision making, while deliberative processing may enhance decisional satisfaction. Conclusions: This investigation of the effect of affective and deliberative processes in DA-supported decision making has implications for the design and use of DAs. DA effectiveness may be enhanced by incorporating a simple instruction to focus on the details of the information.

dc.titleAn exploration of decision aid effectiveness: The impact of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on a health-related decision
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateSubmitted2016-02-11
dcterms.source.volume18
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPage2742
dcterms.source.endPage2752
dcterms.source.issn1369-6513
dcterms.source.titleHealth Expectations
curtin.digitool.pid237892
curtin.pubStatusPublished
curtin.refereedTRUE
curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology and Speech Pathology
curtin.identifier.scriptidPUB-HEA-SPS-BM-90547
curtin.identifier.elementsidELEMENTS-121657
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record