An exploration of decision aid effectiveness: The impact of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on a health-related decision
dc.contributor.author | Davis, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | McCaffery, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mullan, Barbara | |
dc.contributor.author | Juraskova, I. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T15:33:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T15:33:43Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-02-10T19:30:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Davis, E. and McCaffery, K. and Mullan, B. and Juraskova, I. 2015. An exploration of decision aid effectiveness: The impact of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on a health-related decision. Health Expectations. 18 (6): pp. 2742-2752. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47490 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/hex.12248 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Decision aids (DAs) are non-directive communication tools that help patients make value-consistent health-care decisions. However, most DAs have been developed without an explicit theoretical framework, resulting in a lack of understanding of how DAs achieve outcomes. Objective: To investigate the effect of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on DA effectiveness based on dual-process theory. Design, setting and participants: One hundred and forty-eight female university students participated in a randomized controlled experiment with three conditions: emotion-focused, information-focused and control. Preference-value consistency, knowledge, decisional conflict and satisfaction were compared across the conditions using planned contrast analyses. Intervention: The intervention comprised two different DAs and instructional manipulations. The emotion-focused condition received a modified DA with affective content and instructions to induce an affective reaction. The information-focused and control conditions received the same DA without the affective content. The information-focused condition received additional instructions to induce deliberative processing. Results: Controlling for the experiment-wise error rate at P < 0.017, the emotion-focused and information-focused conditions had significantly higher decisional satisfaction than the control condition (P < 0.001). The emotion-focused condition did not demonstrate preference-value consistency. There were no significant differences for decisional conflict and knowledge. Discussion: Results suggest that the promotion of affective processing may hinder value-consistent decision making, while deliberative processing may enhance decisional satisfaction. Conclusions: This investigation of the effect of affective and deliberative processes in DA-supported decision making has implications for the design and use of DAs. DA effectiveness may be enhanced by incorporating a simple instruction to focus on the details of the information. | |
dc.title | An exploration of decision aid effectiveness: The impact of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on a health-related decision | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 18 | |
dcterms.source.number | 6 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 2742 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 2752 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 1369-6513 | |
dcterms.source.title | Health Expectations | |
curtin.department | School of Psychology and Speech Pathology | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access via publisher |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |