Family history and the natural history of colorectal cancer: Systematic review
MetadataShow full item record
Purpose: Family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a known risk factor for CRC and encompasses both genetic and shared environmental risks. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to estimate the impact of family history on the natural history of CRC and adherence to screening. Results: We found high heterogeneity in family-history definitions, the most common definition being one or more first-degree relatives. The prevalence of family history may be lower than the commonly cited 10%, and confirms evidence for increasing levels of risk associated with increasing family-history burden. There is evidence for higher prevalence of adenomas and of multiple adenomas in people with family history of CRC but no evidence for differential adenoma location or adenoma progression by family history. Limited data regarding the natural history of CRC by family history suggest a differential age or stage at cancer diagnosis and mixed evidence with respect to tumor location. Adherence to recommended colonoscopy screening was higher in people with a family history of CRC. Conclusion: Stratification based on polygenic and/or multifactorial risk assessment may mature to the point of displacing family history-based approaches, but for the foreseeable future, family history may remain a valuable clinical tool for identifying individuals at increased risk for CRC.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Schulte, A.; Pandeya, N.; Fawcett, J.; Fritschi, Lin; Klein, K.; Risch, H.; Webb, P.; Whiteman, D.; Neale, R. (2016)PURPOSE: Family history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an established risk factor for the disease. However, associations of pancreatic cancer with other familial cancers are less clear. We analyzed data from the Queensland ...
Jover, R.; Bretthauer, M.; Dekker, E.; Holme, O.; Kaminski, M.; Loberg, M.; Zauber, A.; Hernán, M.; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris; Sunde, A.; McFadden, E.; Castells, A.; Regula, J.; Quintero, E.; Pellisé, M.; Senore, C.; Kalager, M.; Dinis-Ribeiro, M.; Emilsson, L.; Ransohoff, D.; Hoff, G.; Adami, H. (2016)Background: Current guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopies after polyp removal depending on the number and characteristics of polyps, but there is a lack of evidence supporting the recommendations. This report ...
Van Heijningen, E.; Lansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris; Van Hees, F.; Kuipers, E.; Biermann, K.; De Koning, H.; Van Ballegooijen, M.; Steyerberg, E. (2016)Background and study aims: Current surveillance guidelines risk stratify patients with adenoma by using only one or two factors: adenoma multiplicity or presence of an advanced adenoma characteristic. Combinations of ...