Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVolgger, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPichler, S.
dc.contributor.authorHerntrei, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T11:52:45Z
dc.date.available2017-03-24T11:52:45Z
dc.date.created2017-03-23T06:59:52Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationVolgger, M. and Pichler, S. and Herntrei, M. 2015. Part IV Italy: Case 12 Passeiertal/Val Passiria. In Contemporary destination governance: A case study approach, 149-159. Emerald.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51334
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/S2042-144320140000006030
dc.description.abstract

The case of Passeiertal/Val Passiria illustrates how typologies of governance forms help to differentiate cases with concentrated authority from cases with an even distribution of power. In particular, it exemplifies how the interplay between DMOs and powerful private businesses can improve the competitive position of a destination. First, Passeiertal/Val Passiria has managed to develop a common strategy in collaboration with the biggest private player. Second, the whole destination is positioned with the themes driven by the player. The case also shows that property rights theory and principal agent theory may provide useful explanations as to how sustainable destination governance can be improved in situations of significant power asymmetries.

dc.titlePart IV Italy: Case 12 Passeiertal/Val Passiria
dc.typeBook Chapter
dcterms.source.startPage149
dcterms.source.endPage159
dcterms.source.titleContemporary destination governance: A case study approach
dcterms.source.isbn978-1-78350-112-0
dcterms.source.placeBingley
dcterms.source.chapter18
curtin.departmentSchool of Marketing
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record