Is the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (WA) fit for purpose?
MetadataShow full item record
The Biodiversity Conservation Bill 2015 for Western Australia was criticised by scientists and conservation activists for its perceived flaws as it progressed from Bill through to Act. In this article, we summarise what we consider to be the major flaws in the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (WA) and suggest future amendments that could make the Act fit for purpose. Such criticism is important as biodiversity conservation initiatives globally appear to be failing to prevent biodiversity losses. As we move further into the 21st Century we need to identify, enact and implement effective legislation that will produce successful conservation outcomes.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical AustraliaKanowski, J.; Catterrall, C.; Wardell-Johnson, Grant (2005)In Australia, as in many countries, there has been a shift in timber production from native forests to plantations. While plantations are primarily considered an efficient means of producing timber, there is increasing ...
Quantifying the biodiversity values of reforestation: perspectives, design issues and outcomes in Australian rainforest landscapesCatterrall, C.; Kanowski, J.; Wardell-Johnson, Grant; Proctor, H.; Rels, T.; Harrison, D.; Tucker, N. (2004)Following two centuries of land clearing, the past two decades have seen growing efforts to re-establish forest on formerly-cleared sites. While the immediate goals of reforestation vary, there is also a widespread ...
Swarts, N.; Dixon, Kingsley (2009)BackgroundConservation through reserves alone is now considered unlikely to achieve protection of plant species necessary to mitigate direct losses of habitat and the pervasive impact of global climate change. Assisted ...