Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBateman, Bill
dc.contributor.authorPearlman, P.
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, P.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, B.
dc.contributor.authorWardell-Johnson, Grant
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T02:46:20Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T02:46:20Z
dc.date.created2017-04-03T10:56:19Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBateman, B. and Pearlman, P. and Robertson, P. and Schultz, B. and Wardell-Johnson, G. 2017. Is the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (WA) fit for purpose?. Pacific Conservation Biology. -.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51731
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/PC16024
dc.description.abstract

The Biodiversity Conservation Bill 2015 for Western Australia was criticised by scientists and conservation activists for its perceived flaws as it progressed from Bill through to Act. In this article, we summarise what we consider to be the major flaws in the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (WA) and suggest future amendments that could make the Act fit for purpose. Such criticism is important as biodiversity conservation initiatives globally appear to be failing to prevent biodiversity losses. As we move further into the 21st Century we need to identify, enact and implement effective legislation that will produce successful conservation outcomes.

dc.publisherSurrey Beatty and Sons
dc.titleIs the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (WA) fit for purpose?
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume-
dcterms.source.issn1038-2097
dcterms.source.titlePacific Conservation Biology
curtin.departmentDepartment of Environment and Agriculture
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record