Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSohn, Kitae
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T02:46:30Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T02:46:30Z
dc.date.created2017-04-03T10:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationSohn, K. 2016. A review of research on Project STAR and path ahead. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 27 (2): pp. 116-134.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51795
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09243453.2014.994643
dc.description.abstract

© 2014 Taylor & Francis.Understanding the effects of class size reduction (CSR) has been an enduring issue in education. For the past 3 decades, Project STAR has stimulated research and policy discussions regarding the effects of CSR on a variety of outcomes. Schanzenbach (2007) reviewed STAR studies and concluded that small classes improved student academic outcomes. Since her review, however, some research has challenged this conclusion. This paper reviews these recent challenges, comparing past and recent studies. This review is considered together with studies on large-scale CSR policies in the US and CSR studies outside the US. We conclude by suggesting a direction for future research.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.titleA review of research on Project STAR and path ahead
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume27
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage116
dcterms.source.endPage134
dcterms.source.issn0924-3453
dcterms.source.titleSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement
curtin.departmentDepartment of Economics & Property
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record