Improving the Estimation of Risk-Adjusted Grouped Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratios Using Cross-Jurisdictional Linked Administrative Data: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
MetadataShow full item record
Background: Hospitals and death registries in Australia are operated under individual state government jurisdictions. Some state borders are located in heavily populated areas or are located near to major capital cities. Mortality indicators for hospital located near state borders may not be estimated accurately if patients are lost as they cross state borders. The aim of this study was to evaluate how cross-jurisdictional linkage of state hospital and death records across state borders may improve estimation of the hospital standardized mortality ratio (HSMR), a tool used in Australia as a hospital performance indicator. Method: Retrospective cohort study of 7.7 million hospital patients from July 2004 to June 2009. Inhospital deaths and deaths within 30 days of hospital discharge from four state jurisdictions were used to estimate the standardized mortality ratio of hospital groups defined by geography and type of hospital (grouped HSMR) under three record linkage scenarios, as follows: (1) cross-jurisdictional person-level linkage, (2) within-jurisdictional (state-based) person-level linkage, and (3) unlinked records. All public and private hospitals in New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, and public hospitals in South Australia were included in this study. Death registrations from all four states were obtained from state-based registries of births, deaths, and marriages. Results: Cross-jurisdictional linkage identified 11,116 cross-border hospital transfers of which 170 resulted in a cross-border inhospital death. An additional 496 cross-border deaths occurred within 30 days of hospital discharge. The inclusion of cross-jurisdictional person-level links to unlinked hospital records reduced the coefficient of variation among the grouped HSMRs from 0.19 to 0.15; the inclusion of 30-day deaths reduced the coefficient of variation further to 0.11. There were minor changes in grouped HSMRs between cross-jurisdictional and within-jurisdictional linkages, although the impact of cross-jurisdictional linkage increased when restricted to regions with high cross-border hospital use. Conclusion: Cross-jurisdictional linkage modified estimates of grouped HSMRs in hospital groups likely to receive a high proportion of cross-border users. Hospital identifiers will be required to confirm whether individual hospital performance indicators change.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Spilsbury, Katrina; Rosman, D.; Alan, J.; Boyd, James; Ferrante, Anna; Semmens, James (2015)Objective: To determine the quality and effectiveness of national data linkage capacity by performing a proof-of-concept project investigating cross-border hospital use and hospital-related deaths. Design, participants ...
Boyd, James; Randall, Sean; Ferrante, Anna; Bauer, Jacqui; McInneny, K.; Brown, Adrian; Spilsbury, Katrina; Gillies, Margo; Semmens, James (2015)Background - The technical challenges associated with national data linkage, and the extent of cross-border population movements, are explored as part of a pioneering research project. The project involved linking state-based ...
Addressing the challenges of cross-jurisdictional data linkage between a national clinical quality registry and government-held health dataAndrew, N.; Sundararajan, V.; Thrift, A.; Kilkenny, M.; Katzenellenbogen, J.; Flack, F.; Gattellari, M.; Boyd, James; Anderson, P.; Grabsch, B.; Lannin, N.; Johnston, T.; Chen, Y.; Cadilhac, D. (2016)Objective: To describe the challenges of obtaining state and nationally held data for linkage to a non-government national clinical registry. Methods: We reviewed processes negotiated to achieve linkage between the ...