Inattentive professional forecasters
MetadataShow full item record
Using the ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters to characterize expectations at the micro-level, we emphasize two new facts: forecasters (i) fail to systematically update their forecasts and (ii) disagree even when updating. It is moreover found that forecasters have predictable forecast errors. These facts are qualitatively supportive of recent models of inattention and suggest a setup where agents imperfectly process information due to both sticky information à la Mankiw-Reis, and noisy information à la Sims. However, building and estimating such an expectation model, we find that it cannot quantitatively replicate the error and disagreement observed in the data. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Chan, Felix ; Pauwels, L.; Soltyk, S. (2020)This chapter summarises the recent approaches to optimal forecast combination from a frequentist perspective. The availability of big data leads to the development of many different models of the same macroeconomic ...
Chan, Felix ; Pauwels, L. (2015)© 2020 Proceedings - 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, MODSIM 2015. All rights reserved. This paper proposes a unified framework to study the theoretical properties of forecast combination. By setting ...
Lim, Jit Yang (2002)One of the prominent features of the Natural Rubber (NR) market is its price variability, and the aim of this study is to project accurate short-term NR prices. This is accomplished by exploiting the use of forecasting ...