Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalbreath, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorShum, P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:49:21Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:49:21Z
dc.date.created2013-03-21T20:00:53Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationGalbreath, Jeremy and Shum, Paul. 2012. Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR-FP link?: Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management. 37 (2): pp. 211-229.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5936
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0312896211432941
dc.description.abstract

We investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance factors on the financial performance of UK firms. We examine the three factors separately to disentangle the relation of each with performance. We find no difference in the performance of firms with high or low environmental, social or governance rankings. The firms also do not differ in their systematic risks, book-to-market ratios or momentum exposures. However, high-rated firms are consistently larger. Our findings demonstrate that UK investors can incorporate environmental, social or governance criteria into their investment strategies without incurring any significant cost (or benefit) in terms of risk or return.

dc.publisherThe Australian Graduate School of Management
dc.titleDo customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR-FP link?: Evidence from Australia
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume37
dcterms.source.startPage211
dcterms.source.endPage229
dcterms.source.issn03128962
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Journal of Management
curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record