Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: how important is tumour regression?
dc.contributor.author | McCoy, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hemmings, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hillery, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Penter, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bulsara, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zeps, Nikolajs | |
dc.contributor.author | Platell, C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-30T10:50:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-30T10:50:08Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-02-16T19:30:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | McCoy, M. and Hemmings, C. and Hillery, S. and Penter, C. and Bulsara, M. and Zeps, N. and Platell, C. 2015. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: how important is tumour regression? ANZ Journal of Surgery. 87 (12): pp. E233-E239. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/6041 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ans.13394 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is associated with reduced local recurrence and improved long-term outcome. However, the prognostic value of a partial response, or of tumour regression in patients with metastatic disease, is less clear. Methods: We present a single-centre cohort study of 205 patients with stage II–IV rectal cancer treated with surgery and neoadjuvant CRT between 2006 and 2013. Tumour regression was assessed using the Dworak system. Results: The probability of 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 95% for Dworak grade 4, 82% for grade 3, 64% for grade 2 and 53% for grade 1 (P = 0.0005). In univariate regression analysis, Dworak grade was associated with RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, P < 0.0001; trend analysis) and cancer-specific survival (HR 0.52, P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, Dworak grade remained an independent predictor of RFS (HR 0.62, P = 0.012), along with clinical metastases stage, resection margin status, the presence or absence of extramural venous invasion and type of surgical procedure. Conclusions: Tumour regression grade after neoadjuvant CRT was an independent prognostic factor for RFS, highlighting the importance of the degree of local response to CRT. | |
dc.title | Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: how important is tumour regression? | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.title | ANZ Journal of Surgery | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |