Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPardo, D.
dc.contributor.authorPaszynski, M.
dc.contributor.authorCollier, N.
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, J.
dc.contributor.authorDalcin, L.
dc.contributor.authorCalo, Victor
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T05:25:38Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T05:25:38Z
dc.date.created2018-02-01T04:49:24Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationPardo, D. and Paszynski, M. and Collier, N. and Alvarez, J. and Dalcin, L. and Calo, V. 2012. A survey on direct solvers for Galerkin methods. SeMA Journal. 57: pp. 107-134.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62810
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF03322602
dc.description.abstract

In this paper we describe the history, performance, and design concepts of direct solvers for algebraic systems resulting from Galerkin discretizations of partial differential equations. Popular direct solver implementations of Gaussian elimination (also known as LU factorization) are introduced and briefly analyzed. We discuss three of the most relevant aspects influencing the performance of direct solvers on this kind of algebraic systems. First, the ordering of the degrees of freedom of the algebraic system has a significant impact on the solver performance, solution speed and memory requirements. The impact of unknowns ordering for elimination is exemplified and alternative ordering algorithms are described and compared. Second, the effect of round-off error on the simulation results is discussed. We detail this effect for uniform grids where the impact of round-off error on the solution is controlled by the condition number of the matrix in terms of the element size, but is independent of the polynomial order of approximation. Additionally, we discuss the link between unknown ordering and round-off error. Third, we describe the impact of the connectivity pattern (graph) of the basis functions on the performance of direct solvers. Variations in the connectivity structure of the resulting discrete system have severe impact on performance of the solver. That is, the resources needed to factorize the system strongly depend on its connectivity graph. Less connected graphs are cheaper to solve, that is, C0 finite element discretizations are cheaper to solve with direct solvers than Cp−1 discretizations.

dc.titleA survey on direct solvers for Galerkin methods
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume57
dcterms.source.startPage107
dcterms.source.endPage134
dcterms.source.issn2254-3902
dcterms.source.titleSeMA Journal
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record