Comparative effects of A1 versus A2 beta-casein on gastrointestinal measures: a blinded randomised cross-over pilot study
dc.contributor.author | Ho, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Woodford, K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kukuljan, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pal, Sebely | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-01T05:25:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-01T05:25:41Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-02-01T04:49:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ho, S. and Woodford, K. and Kukuljan, S. and Pal, S. 2014. Comparative effects of A1 versus A2 beta-casein on gastrointestinal measures: a blinded randomised cross-over pilot study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 68: pp. 994-1000. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/62832 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/ejcn.2014.127 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background/objectives:At present, there is debate about the gastrointestinal effects of A1-type beta-casein protein in cows' milk compared with the progenitor A2 type. In vitro and animal studies suggest that digestion of A1 but not A2 beta-casein affects gastrointestinal motility and inflammation through the release of beta-casomorphin-7. We aimed to evaluate differences in gastrointestinal effects in a human adult population between milk containing A1 versus A2 beta-casein.Subjects/methods:Forty-one females and males were recruited into this double-blinded, randomised 8-week cross-over study. Participants underwent a 2-week dairy washout (rice milk replaced dairy), followed by 2 weeks of milk (750 ml/day) that contained beta-casein of either A1 or A2 type before undergoing a second washout followed by a final 2 weeks of the alternative A1 or A2 type milk.Results:The A1 beta-casein milk led to significantly higher stool consistency values (Bristol Stool Scale) compared with the A2 beta-casein milk. There was also a significant positive association between abdominal pain and stool consistency on the A1 diet (r=0.520, P=0.001), but not the A2 diet (r=-0.13, P=0.43). The difference between these two correlations (0.52 versus -0.13) was highly significant (P<0.001). Furthermore, some individuals may be susceptible to A1 beta-casein, as evidenced by higher faecal calprotectin values and associated intolerance measures.Conclusions:These preliminary results suggest differences in gastrointestinal responses in some adult humans consuming milk containing beta-casein of either the A1 or the A2 beta-casein type, but require confirmation in a larger study of participants with perceived intolerance to ordinary A1 beta-casein-containing milk.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition advance online publication, 2 July 2014; doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.127. | |
dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group | |
dc.title | Comparative effects of A1 versus A2 beta-casein on gastrointestinal measures: a blinded randomised cross-over pilot study | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0954-3007 | |
dcterms.source.title | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition | |
curtin.department | Epidemiology and Biostatistics | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |